| Universal Design for Instruction Project (Phase 1) -
University of Connecticut |
Project Abstract
Project Directors:
Dr. Stan Shaw, Professor and Co-Director, Postsecondary Education
Disability Unit
Dr. Joan McGuire, Professor and Co-Director, Postsecondary Education
Disability Unit |
Download
the abstract. |
| General Project Description |
As the twentieth century ends, postsecondary education
for students with disabilities is at a crossroads. Although increasing
numbers of students with disabilities are accessing postsecondary
education, there are escalating challenges relating to the provision
of modifications and accommodations. This is particularly true for
students with “hidden disabilities” (e.g.,learning disabilities,
ADHD, traumatic brain injury) as it relates to the academic requirements
of many postsecondary institutions.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) first require the identification of a disability and then
ensure eligible students accommodations and supports as a protected
class. Despite statutory regulations, it has often been difficult
for faculty to embrace academic accommodations and program modifications
for students with disabilities. Postsecondary institutions have
had more success providing physical access for most students but
academic access, particularly for students with mild cognitive disabilities,
raises substantial challenges.
This project will apply the principles of Universal Design to instruction
to promote academic access for all students including those with
learning disabilities (LD). Universal Design was proposed in the
late 1970's in response to a conceptual need of advocates for barrier-free,
physical environments. It is defined as “an approach to creating
environments and products that are usable by all people to the greatest
extent possible” without the need for adaptation or specialized
design. Its “inclusivity . . . makes it cost effective; universal
design increases the number of people whose needs are being addressed
and it encourages an integrative approach rather than multiple separate
solutions" (Welch, 1995, p. 1). As a concept most often associated
with the design of buildings, products and public space, its relevance
became more dramatic with the passage of the ADA with its emphasis
on civil rights and equal access for persons with disabilities.
Although the concept of Universal Design originated to address physical
and structural barriers, the instructional environment also lends
itself to this concept, an approach termed Universal Instructional
Design (UID) (Center for Applied Special Technology [CAST|, 1999;
Orkwis & McLane, 1998; Silver, Bourke, & Stehorn, 1998).
The application of Universal Instructional Design to postsecondary
education, the lynchpin of this proposal, represents an innovative,
creative, and provocative approach to enhancing the instructional
milieu in higher education settings and assuring programmatic access.
Its universality is its allure: all students will benefit from the
integration of effective and efficient teaching methods and strategies
to ensure students with LD a quality higher education. Other chronic
health conditions or neurological disorders (e.g., cerebral palsy,
advanced Lyme disease, fibromyalgia) frequently are accompanied
by cognitive impairments. Diversity among student learners, a goal
of higher education, includes diversity of learning styles. By focusing
on methods and strategies that promote learning, this proposal embraces
an inclusionary approach to a quality education regardless of the
cause of cognitive/learning difficulties.
The project will identify barriers to equal access to instruction
so that approaches and products to overcome those barriers can be
developed. It will also identify the components of effective instruction
especially as they relate to students with learning and cognitive
disabilities.
Products will be field-tested, evaluated, revised, and packaged.
State-of-the-art distance learning technologies will be used to
make the products easily accessible to faculty and administrators
at colleges throughout the country. Collaboration with Undergraduate
Deans and college Teaching and Learning Centers and Faculty/Instructional
Resource Labs will be the primary conduits for dissemination and
use on a national scale. |
| Major Project Goals |
- To identify barriers/bridges to the assurance of academic access
as perceived by students with LD, faculty, and administrators.
- To establish Instructional Excellence Administrative Teams
for the purpose of implementing Universal Instructional Design
across all elements of the academic milieu.
- To apply the concept of Universal Design to the instructional
environment to develop approaches and products that will ensure
students with LD a quality higher education program using exemplary
college instructors, classes, and materials across the spectrum
of academic environments (e.g., large lecture class, seminar,
lab) and academic departments.
- To field-test, evaluate, and revise the products and materials.
- To package the products and materials using high quality and
easy to access state-of-the-art distance learning technologies.
- To distribute and evaluate the products and materials through
collaboration with Undergraduate Deans, Teaching and Learning
Centers, Faculty/Instructional Resource Labs, and higher education
organizations nationally, as well as through voice, print, and
electronic media.
|
| Major Project Activities |
- Based on information from an extensive review of the literature
on Universal Design, its application to instruction, validated
teaching methods and strategies for students with LD, and approaches
to professional development for faculty and administration, focus
groups and interviews of faculty, administrators, and students
with LD will be conducted to identify their perceptions of barriers
and bridges to equal academic access.
- Instructional Excellence Administrative Teams will be established
and trained to implement Universal Instructional Design across
all academic programs including ways to promote faculty development
relating to empirically validated effective teaching methods and
strategies for students with LD.
- Professors from different settings (i.e., two- and four-year
colleges and universities) who incorporate innovative and effective
teaching methods and strategies in their classes will be identified
and recruited to model and demonstrate examples of Universal Instructional
Design. Examples of effective instructional planning (e.g., identifying
essential course components, technical standards, and outcomes/competencies;
constructing syllabi); delivery of instruction (e.g., multi-media
presentations; cooperative learning; concept mapping; use of technology;
scaffolding), and evaluation of learning (e.g., test format and
item construction; alternative modes of demonstrating mastery)
will be gathered across the spectrum of academic environments
(large lecture
classes, seminars, labs) and academic disciplines. Demonstrations,
interviews, and materials will be organized, edited, and packaged.
Strategies and materials will also be developed by Instructional
Excellence Administrative Teams for use
by administrators to implement Universal Instructional Design
to enhance instruction for all students.The products and materials
will be field-tested with faculty from various postsecondary institutions
resulting in evaluation feedback for revision of products.
- The products and materials will be packaged in high quality
state-of-the-art distance learning formats (e.g., the University
of Connecticut Instructional Excellence Web Site, CD-ROM, Web-based
instruction), which the literature on professional development
and feedback from faculty and administrators indicate would be
most effectively accessed by faculty.
- Products and materials initially will be distributed to colleges
across the country through collaboration with Undergraduate Deans,
Teaching and Learning Centers, Faculty/Instructional Resource
Labs, professional organizations, etc., based upon their willingness
to provide electronically transmitted evaluative feedback. Information
on the products and their efficacy will also be disseminated through
national presentations, publications, and linkages on Web sites
(e.g., HEATH, RRTC) to the repository of electronic resources
at the University of Connecticut.
|
|